Current:Home > InvestFTC fines Experian for littering inboxes with spam, giving customers no way to unsubscribe -Elite Financial Minds
FTC fines Experian for littering inboxes with spam, giving customers no way to unsubscribe
View
Date:2025-04-19 10:21:49
Experian Consumer Services will have to pay the Federal Trade Commission $650,000 in fines for spamming people's inboxes and giving them no way to unsubscribe.
The company also does business as ConsumerInfo.com, Inc. and provides consumers with their credit information. Experian sent customers numerous emails but did not provide clear details on to opt out once they signed up to manage their Experian credit report information. According to the FTC, this allegedly violated the CAN-SPAM Act, which requires businesses to give email recipients an opt-out mechanism.
“Signing up for a membership doesn’t mean you’re signing up for unwanted email, especially when all you’re trying to do is freeze your credit to protect your identity,” said Samuel Levine, director of the FTC’s bureau of consumer protection. “You always have the right to unsubscribe from marketing messages, and the FTC takes enforcing that right seriously.”
In a comment to USA TODAY, Experian said they disagreed with the FTCs allegations, but the agreement allowed them to move forward to continue serving consumers.
“Consistent with our goal to ensure consumers have clear and relevant information, in addition to the changes requested by the Federal Trade Commission, we also have launched a new Email Preferences Center, found at the bottom of every marketing email communication, that goes further," an Experian spokesperson said in a prepared statement. “By providing our customers with account updates and information, we’re empowering them to take control of their financial lives, safeguard their identity and improve their financial health.”
The spammy emails
According to the Department of Justice's complaint, the emails started once consumers created an online account with the company to manage their credit report. The emails included credit card offers, service pitches to improve credit scores, discounts on auto-related services and products, and paid memberships for Experian services such as IdentityWorks Premium.
But some customers who specifically opted out of receiving emails about “Personalized insights and offers” still got them, the complaint states.
The other marketing campaign emails were about confirming the type of car they own, urging people to boost their FICO score, and do a "Dark Web scan" to check if their information was compromised. These emails made consumers think they were personal notifications regarding their account and didn't give a link for consumers to unsubscribe and instead urged consumers to add Experian's email address to their address book, the complaint states.
What does the CAN-SPAM Act prohibit?
The CAN-SPAM Act stands for Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act, and sets requirements for those who send unsolicited commercial emails, according to the FTC. Businesses need to comply with CAN-SPAM Act guidelines, which prohibit false or misleading email header information and deceptive subject lines, require clear identification that email is an advertisement, provide recipients with a valid physical postal address, how to opt-out from receiving emails and honor those requests promptly.
And each email that violates the act is subject up to $50,120 in penalties, which can add up quickly.
The very first cases that FTC took on was in 2004 were against Detroit-based Phoenix Avatar and Australia-based Global Web Promotions Pty Ltd.
Phoenix Avatar spammed people with emails about diet patches that cost $59.95. Consumers who got the email, clicked on a hyperlink that redirected them to a different website, one of many which the company operated. The company used third party email addresses to hide its identity and didn't give consumers the ability to opt-out of emails.
The FTC also came down on Global Web Promotions Pty Ltd., for spamming people's emails with an advertisement for a diet patch that cost $80.90. They also falsely advertised that their human growth hormone products, which cost $74.95, could maintain a person's "appearance and current biological age for the next 10 to 20 years.”
veryGood! (85)
Related
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- Van Zweden earned $1.5M as New York Philharmonic music director in 2022-23
- Man serving 20-year sentence in New York makes it on the ballot for Alaska’s lone U.S. House seat
- 4 Las Vegas teens plead guilty in juvenile court in beating death of classmate: Reports
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- Olympian Rebecca Cheptegei Dead at 33 After Being Set on Fire in Gasoline Attack
- Underwater tunnel to Manhattan leaks after contractor accidentally drills through it
- Love Is Blind's Shaina Hurley Shares She Was Diagnosed With Cancer While Pregnant
- New Mexico governor seeks funding to recycle fracking water, expand preschool, treat mental health
- The Sweet Way Olivia Culpo and Christian McCaffrey Stay Connected During the NFL Season
Ranking
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- A Florida county’s plan to turn a historic ship into the world’s largest artificial reef hits a snag
- USA TODAY's NFL Survivor Pool is back: What you need to know to win $5K cash
- Ravens not running from emotions in charged rematch with Chiefs
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- Tribal leaders push Republican Tim Sheehy to apologize for comments on Native Americans
- Adele Pulls Hilarious Revenge Prank on Tabloids By Creating Her Own Newspaper
- American Jessica Pegula rips No. 1 Iga Swiatek, advances to US Open semifinals
Recommendation
Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
Ina Garten Says Her Father Was Physically Abusive
Mark Meadows asks judge to move Arizona’s fake elector case to federal court
Blue Jackets players, GM try to make sense of tragedy after deaths of Johnny and Matthew Gaudreau
Brianna LaPaglia Reveals The Meaning Behind Her "Chickenfry" Nickname
How Taylor Swift Scored With Her Style Every Time She Attended Boyfriend Travis Kelce’s Games
Bill Belichick, Nick Saban were often brutal with media. Now they are media.
John Stamos Reveals Why He Was Kicked Out of a Scientology Church